DNF & Tropes I Avoid
Every reviewer has stuff they just can’t get past, and I’d rather tell you mine straight up than pretend I’m some neutral robot about it. There are a few tropes that yank me right out of a book no matter how well it’s written. Here’s the list, so you know how to read my reviews.
My DNF policyWhat DNF means here
If I don’t finish a book, I’ll say so and tell you exactly where and why I bailed. I won’t slap a star rating on a DNF because that’s not fair to a book I didn’t actually finish, but I’ll still walk you through how far I got and what made me tap out.
And a DNF from me is NOT me telling you to skip it. The thing that lost me might genuinely be your favorite part. If I drop a book you love, my reasoning should at least tell you whether my problem with it would even be a problem for you.
This is my big one. When the MMC is the bully — going out of his way to humiliate the FMC, targeting her, making her life hell — I just cannot get on board with the romance, no matter how good the redemption arc is supposed to be. I know that’s a me thing more than a writing thing, and that’s fine. It’s still a wall I slam into every single time.
To be super clear: enemies to lovers is totally fine by me. Give me cold, hostile, combative, morally gray, all of it. The specific thing that loses me is the deliberate cruelty that bully romance runs on.
Given the name of this site, this probably isn’t shocking. I read why choose specifically because I don’t think she should have to pick. A classic love triangle, where the whole tension is her eventually choosing one guy and crushing the other, just does not work for me. It sticks me rooting against a character I actually like, and I hate that feeling.
Why choose, reverse harem, pack romance — anything where everyone stays in and nobody gets left out in the cold — is what I’d take every single time. And if a book sells itself as why choose and then pulls a love triangle ending on me? I will be SO annoyed, and the review will say exactly that.
There’s a specific setup where the MMC’s been flat-out lying to the FMC the whole time — not just sitting on a secret but actively deceiving her — and the book wants me to forgive it because aw, he had his reasons. I really struggle to come back from that, especially when she forgives him in like a page and a half.
The line for me is keeping a secret to protect yourself or because of circumstances versus straight-up lying to manipulate someone. The first I can usually roll with. The second wears on me fast, and I’ll call it out when it shows up.
This goes for everyone in the group — FMC and MMCs alike. The entire appeal of why choose for me is that it’s all out in the open and everybody’s agreed to it. So the second someone starts sneaking around behind the rest of the group, I’m out. Doesn’t matter who it is.
Cheating used as a plot device that the book then tries to excuse or romanticize is an instant DNF. I’m here for the mess and the multiple love interests, I just want it to be honest mess. Everyone at the table should know what’s on it.
A note before you go
This is all just my taste and it shapes how I review, full stop. None of it is me saying these tropes are objectively bad or that you’re wrong for loving them. Romance is personal, tropes are personal. If bully romance is your comfort read, genuinely, good for you — I just want you to know my reviews are coming from someone who doesn’t click with it, so you can factor that in.
Any time one of these shows up in a book I’m reviewing, I’ll flag it so you’re not blindsided. You get to decide for yourself how much my opinion is even worth on it.